Category: Current Affairs

Assignment of Debts by a Liquidator

September 20, 2011 No Comments by

In a recent case the NSW Court of Appeal shed light on certain limitations on the powers of a liquidator under s477(2) of the Corporations Act 2001. In Owners of Strata Plan 5290 v CGS & Co Pty Ltd the question was whether a liquidator could assign the debts of a company under s477(2)(c), where [...]

Read More »

“I do, in sickness and in health” – recent consideration of the enforceability of guarantee against spouses

June 22, 2011 No Comments by posterousPost

In the recent decision of Agripay Pty Ltd v Byrne the court considered some of the prospective complications that lenders face in enforcing guarantees given by spouses, in particular wives with no involvement in the business. In essence, it was determined that liability under a guarantee could be avoided where the spouse is not obtaining [...]

Read More »

TRUSTEES’ RIGHTS TO VOID TRANSFER OF PROPERTY

January 24, 2011 No Comments by

OVERVIEW Transfers of property which occur post-bankruptcy may not attract the avoidance provisions of the Bankruptcy Act 1996 (Cth) (the “Act”). The decision of the Federal Court in Trustees of the Property of Camm v Linke Nominees Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1148 (Camm v Linke), scrutinizes the rights of Trustees’ in avoiding a transfer if [...]

Read More »

EVADING THE TRAP IN TRAP ORDERS

January 23, 2011 No Comments by

Often the court relies on “trap” orders. What is a trap order? A trap order is imposed in order to gather evidence in litigation matters that revolve around claims based on misleading or deceptive conduct or passing off. However, in instances where one fails to give the respondent a notice about the trap dealing, the [...]

Read More »

AUTOMATED DATABASES NOT COPYRIGHTED?

January 22, 2011 No Comments by

In the recent case of Telstra Corporation Limited v Phone Directories Company Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 44, the Full Federal Court held that computer generated databases are not protected by copyright laws as these do not add any literary value or human authorship to the original literary work. QUICK FACTS Telstra created a compilation from [...]

Read More »

CORPORATE TRUSTEES AND THEIR LIQUIDATOR’S REMUNERATION

January 20, 2011 No Comments by

RE DALEWON PTY LTD [2010] QSC 311 The recent case in Re Dalewon highlights the conditions in which a liquidator of a corporate trustee is allowed to turn to trust assets to reclaim their fee and other expenses. In such a situation, the liquidator must produce clear proof which states that work carried out by [...]

Read More »

REVIVAL IN A NEW ERA

January 21, 2010 No Comments by

In an ideal world and a new decade, everyone would win the lottery and in this financial slowdown, all your money problems would disappear. While there isn’t much Sajen Legal can do about the first one, we can certainly offer you advice to help you protect your personal and professional financial portfolio, banishing those economic [...]

Read More »

THE RISE OF THE PHOENIX – CORPORATES GO INCOGNITO

January 21, 2010 No Comments by

The regular tribulations of the Global Financial Crisis in the guise of unemployment and financial struggles have been dwarfed by a more sophisticated evil. Fraudulent activities and organized misbehavior disguised under a trend, known as ‘Phoenix activity’, although not a new trend, is gaining momentum in Australia in recent times. What is Phoenix activity? Phoenix, [...]

Read More »

THE DARK SECRET OF CHOCOLATES

January 21, 2010 No Comments by

Forrest Gump was right. ‘Life is like a box of chocolates – you never know what you’re going to get!’ In the intellectual property game this is especially true for the chocolate industry and big brand names such as Mars, Cadbury and Sweet Rewards. Mars Australia, in Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty [...]

Read More »

Public Hearing on Gene Patents

September 2, 2009 No Comments by

Public Hearings to Discuss Gene Patents September, 2009 The debate as to whether companies should be allowed to patent genes escalated this month with an Australian Senate committee holding public hearings on the topic. Gene patenting gives intellectual property rights over isolated gene sequences and their uses, if the chemical structure of the isolated sequence [...]

Read More »