Taking Advantage – How Does Undue Influence Affect Contracts

The legal principle of undue influence provides that a contract may be set aside or at least voidable in favour of the purported ‘weaker party’, should the agreement have arisen from a relationship of influence between the parties. Not all such transactions are remediable, but where established, the ‘weaker party’ will have the option to rescind the contract. 

The doctrine is applicable to the following two categories:

Actual Undue Influence:

It arises where, in regard to a gift or contract, it is proven that the ‘dominant party’ exerted influence over the ‘weaker party’ to induce the giving of the gift or entry into the contract.

Presumed Undue Influence:

Where a relationship of influence is presumed. Whilst the list is not exhaustive, such relationships include:

  • parent and child
  • guardian and ward
  • trustee and cestui que trust
  • solicitor and client
  • physician and patient
  • cases of religious influence

For a ‘dominant party’ to refute the presumption of undue influence, he/she must establish beyond the balance of probabilities that the purported ‘weaker party’ acted independently and understood their actions, from a position of free judgement.   

Why the doctrine is important

Why do we need the doctrine of undue influence at all? This question is more so a matter of social science than it is a question of law. The doctrine was developed in response to the instinctive inclination for mankind to exploit others for their own personal gain. As such, the doctrine operates solely “to control opportunism”. 

Is it right and expedient to save persons from the consequences of their own folly? Or is it right and expedient to save them from being victimised by other people? The doctrine of undue influence was in fact founded upon the latter of these two principles. 

As such, the operation of the doctrine is one of strict liability, in response to the potential victimisation of a weaker party.  The strict implementation of the doctrine is a necessary result of the difficulty in detecting undue influence. 

Need advice, Sajen Legal are here to help – Contact Us.

Tagged in: , ,


You may also be interested in:

AI and the conduct of litigation: New Practice Direction in Queensland provides guidance

  There is growing use of generative AI to assist legal practitioners in the day-to-day practice of law. Used effectively, it can be a powerful tool for practitioners. Used poorly, it can be a disaster for client and lawyer alike. On 24 September 2025, the Queensland Supreme Court issued Practice Direction 5 of 2025 which continue reading

Security of Payment: How to Protect Your Trade Business and Get Paid Faster

Cash flow is the lifeblood of every trade and construction business. Whether you’re a sole trader on the tools or managing a crew across multiple sites, getting paid on time for the work you’ve done is critical. Yet too often, contractors and subcontractors face delays, disputes, or silence when chasing money owed. In construction, the continue reading

5 Employment Law Myths Debunked

Employment law naturally attracts common misconceptions about the rules and regulations governing the workplace. These misconceptions often lead to misunderstandings and detrimental consequences for both employees and employers. In this article, I debunk five common employment law myths in Australia and provide clarity around the rights and responsibilities of employees and employers. Setting the Scene continue reading

Liability Limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation | Website by VA