Pay Up or Sell Up – Charging Clauses and Caveatable Interests in Land

Creditors often ask whether they are entitled to lodge a caveat over a debtor’s property as a mechanism for securing payment of outstanding debts.

While it is in force, a caveat prevents the registration of certain dealings affecting the land in relation to which it is lodged.

Relevantly, a registered caveat will prevent the transfer of legal ownership of land, or the registration of a new mortgage (which might otherwise deplete the ‘equity’ in the land).

A caveat may significantly increase a creditor’s prospects of recovering an unpaid debt because:

  1. The debtor’s ability to realise and/or dispose of the equity in the land will be limited, thereby protecting the pool of assets available to satisfy the debt; and
  2. A caveat may put commercial pressure on the debtor to pay the debt promptly (particularly if the debtor is relying on the sale or refinance of its land to fund its ongoing operations).

Caveatable Interest

To be entitled to lodge a caveat, a party must have a ‘caveatable interest’ in land.

There are a range of circumstances which may give rise to a caveatable interest. Simply being owed a debt will not, on its own, suffice.

The most common way in which a caveatable interest will arise in the creditor/debtor context is the existence of a ‘charging clause’ in a binding contract between the parties.

Charging clauses typically provide that certain assets are to be used as security for the obligations of a party to the agreement, such that any land owned by a debtor may be sold to satisfy any amounts that may become owing to the creditor under the agreement.

Lodging a caveat provides interim protection only. The process is designed to maintain the status quo by ‘freezing’ title to land until a party has been given an opportunity to establish its asserted interest in the land in a competent court.

In Queensland, caveats that are lodged without the consent of the registered owner of land will lapse if court proceedings seeking to establish the interest claimed by the caveat are not commenced by the earlier of:

  1. Three months of lodgement of the caveat; or
  2. Fourteen days from the owner giving notice to the caveator requiring that such proceedings be commenced.

If a caveat lapses, it may be removed from the title and will have no further effect.

Importantly, a party may not lodge more than one caveat on substantially the same grounds without the leave of the court. In most cases, you only get one bite at the cherry.

There can be serious consequences for lodging a caveat without proper grounds.

If you or your clients are owed money, or otherwise wish to establish an interest in land, you should seek legal advice as to whether there are proper grounds for a caveat to be lodged.

And finally, if you or your clients are providing trade credit or propose entering into arrangements which may result in a significant debt being owed, a charging clause should be included in the contract to ensure that the right to payment may be secured.

Tagged in: , ,


You may also be interested in:

Mastering the Framework: Alex and Jordan Navigate the Essentials of Business Contracts

In the bustling world of entrepreneurship, the story of Alex, a seasoned builder in his late 50s, and Jordan, a tech-savvy dynamo in her mid-30s, continues as they delve into the crucial realm of contracts. Their construction tech venture in Southeast Queensland, poised for innovation, now faces the intricate dance of drafting and negotiating contracts—a continue reading

The Crossroads of Change

John let out a weary sigh, rubbing his temples as he finally tore his gaze from the glass facade of the Harrison Home Solutions headquarters, the Sunshine Coast skyline bathed in the golden glow of dusk behind it. He checked his watch instinctively, though he knew it was almost 7 PM. Elizabeth would be waiting continue reading

Navigating Intellectual Property Rights: Alex and Jordan’s Strategic Edge in Innovation

In the bustling entrepreneurial world of Southeast Queensland, Alex and Jordan, fresh from their strategic decision to form a proprietary limited company, now face the crucial world of intellectual property (IP) rights. Their ambition to revolutionize the construction tech industry is more than just a business plan; it’s an innovation journey brimming with ideas that continue reading

Liability Limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation | Website by VA